Stauber wants to make Gophers ‘most fun team to watch in college hockey’

All Robb Stauber wants from his alma mater is an interview

When you talk to Stauber, his intensity, honesty and determination are readily apparent, and you have to believe him when he says he would love the opportunity to lift the University of Minnesota Golden Gopher hockey program back up to where it belongs — as the elite college hockey program in the country.

“This program is in trouble, and I’m not sure they know it,” Stauber said. “First of all, I hope I can get an interview. If I do, I will absolutely say what I believe. There is not a chance in hell I would say something I don’t believe in, just to get the job. I will explain what I would do — that we will unleash the talent to go north, south, diagonally, and all over, and do things that are very different to keep possession of the puck, and make the Gophers the most fun team to watch in college hockey.”

That’s the same attitude he brought to the job as head coach of Team USA’s women’s team, which he led down his own forceful and controversial path with a revolutionary style that swept the U.S. to the gold medal at the Winter Olympics in South Korea.

Don Lucia decided to retire early this week, after 19 years of coaching the Gophers to the first and only two NCAA championships they’d won since Herb Brooks won three national titles in an amazing seven-year run through the 1970s, ending a gap of 23 years.

The line of potential successors has been immediate, long, and growing, there will be major campaigns to support some of them.

Robb Stauber will be the one off to the side, easy to overlook, possibly, but armed with the exact outlook and historic perspective to do what many think is impossible: unifying the scattered M-Club hockey boosters who have turned away from the program, reuniting the entire state’s high school structure behind the Gophers, and, without even intending to, rekindling the torch that Herbie not only carried, but created.

In 1988, Stauber was the first goaltender to receive the Hobey Baker Award given to the player deemed to be the best in college hockey that season. (Photo courtesy of University of Minnesota Athletics)

Stauber’s resume is richer in quality than quantity, since coming from Duluth Denfeld High School to the ‘U,‘ where he became the first goaltender to ever win the Hobey Baker Award back in 1988, and dominated WCHA goaltending statistics while leading Minnesota to the NCAA Frozen Four in all three years he played. He played on some Team USA outfits, and played for the Los Angeles Kings in the NHL before becoming a highly decorated goaltending coach at Minnesota, UMD, in running his own hockey schools, and by coaching goaltenders for USA Hockey. Eight years after starting to coach Team USA goalies, Stauber was offered the chance to be head coach. Ironic timing in a game that has become more primitive in its evolution, and lost Stauber as a fan.

“I can’t stand watching hockey,” Stauber said. “It is so bad, that I have gotten sick watching dump-and-chase hockey. Four years ago, I was sitting upstairs at the Women’s Olympic finals, and we were up 2-0 with 14 minutes left. Our plan was to dump the puck in to protect the lead, and Canada scored twice to tie it and beat us in overtime.

“I said, ‘I can’t stay involved if this is how we’re going to play.’

“It was a miracle I got the U.S. coaching job,” Stauber added. “Reagan Carey, our manager, had been sitting upstairs with me watching the team play for years. I always talked to her about how we could do things differently. She recognized that we were doing some old-school things, and she decided to take a chance on me.”

Stauber made changes in personnel, including the addition of Maddie Rooney, the youngest player on the team, as one of three goaltenders. The current UMD star started all but one game in South Korea, including the brilliant performance in the gold medal shootout game against Canada.

But mostly, he patiently but surely changed the ingrained, instinctive style of every player on the team into his own concept, which greatly resembles the regrouping puck-control style of the Russians, and of Herb Brooks.

“I am really disappointed that the media never even asked us about the transition in the way we played, and the players have never truly gotten the credit for what we went through,” said Stauber. “They had all come from good college programs, and they were all used to playing the traditional style, which meant getting out of your zone and then dumping the puck into the other end.

“We wanted them to bring the puck back and regrouping, sometimes more than once bringing the puck back out of the offensive zone to keep possession. There was a lot of resistance, and a lot of pain transforming what they all believed in to what we wanted to do. The players would complain, ‘what about scoring?’ and I’d say don’t worry about scoring; if we keep the puck, the scoring will come. We looked like a peewee team sometimes while we were making the transition in style.”

The style of creative hockey Stauber believes in is in stark contrast to traditional North American hockey, which has become a simplistic game of chipping the puck out of the zone, and sending it in deep to the offensive zone, hoping to forecheck for a turnover and a scoring chance. So uniform is the game these days that if you listen to broadcast analysts their only assessment is: “They’ve got to get the puck in deep, and get pucks and bodies to the net.”

Stauber believes otherwise, and he is too young to realize that Brooks harbored the same beliefs, privately, before experimenting with them during his years with the Gophers.

Photo courtesy of Stauber’s Goalcrease Training and Equipment Center

“I was always enthralled with what Herbie was able to accomplish at Minnesota, and it made me want to go there as I was growing up,” Stauber said. “You look back at the Russian teams back then, and they were without question the best at skill and imagination of how to play the game. They don’t play dump-and-chase; they keep possession of the puck until they can create a good scoring chance. Herbie’s style was similar, and when he went to coach the New York Rangers, I watched them on TV every time I had the chance.

“In 1989, I got the chance to play for the U.S. along with John Vanbiesbrouck, and I got the chance to start against the Russians in what was Igor Larionov’s last World Championships. They had guys like Fetisov and Krutov and I think they started me so they could save Vanbiesbrouck. I didn’t sleep the night before. I’d studied them, and I knew they would pass up scoring plays to set up back-door plays, and I knew I would have to adjust my game because they could make a goalie look silly. I think we lost 3-1, but it was 2-1 late.”

Believing in a system that is alien to North American players was a bold gamble. Brooks did it with his hand-selected team for 1980, and while the changeover was virtually ignored by the media who don’t really understand the game’s nuances, Stauber was more concerned with getting all his players on board. His staff included Brett Strot, who had been Stauber’s trusted ally since they were teammates and roommates in Gopher days, and Paul Mara, a high school coach in Boston who joined fairly late.

“Paul got so excited about what we were trying to do that he’d call people and say they wouldn’t believe what we were doing. Coaching women is a lot different than coaching men. The women will listen to what you say, and do it. It was difficult to get them to go out and improvise, because they were used to being shown by Xs and Os what to do next. We wanted them to keep possession of the puck, but when they got a chance, to go for it and make plays on their own.”

Shades of Herbie’s “Sophisticated pond hockey.”

It wasn’t until late in their development year, December, maybe, that Stauber said he felt that everybody had bought into the whole plan. “If any one of us coaches, or any of the players, didn’t believe in it, it wouldn’t have worked,” he said. “When we got to the point where it was working, some Canadian players gathered to watch us practice. We were doing random regroups, and I’d say to the players that I didn’t know what the Canadian players could learn from it; they can’t figure out what we’re going to do, because we don’t know what we’re going to do.

“We did different drills every day, almost all of them situational, using different forechecks, all intending on getting the players to read what their opponents were doing, and anticipate what they might do. It was great, because no two days of practice were the same, and it forced me to constantly think of what more we might do. There are no drills that can work in every situation.”

Was he surprised at the impressive results the team achieved in South Korea? Was he nervous?

“No, I wasn’t nervous,” he said. “I was happy and excited, but not surprised. We executed the way we practiced, and part of execution is winning. After we won, some good hockey people started to understand what we were doing. But I don’t think the players ever got enough credit from the media, who got all caught up in the hoopla.

(teamusa.usahockey.com photo)

“I’m so proud of what we accomplished. After every game, Igor Larionov waited for me and gave me a hug. He was so excited about how we were playing, he said, ‘The girls are smarter than the guys.’ He was genuinely enthused about what we had done. The Russians learned to be the most creative and dynamic team ever in hockey, and I believe part of that was because their lives were controlled so much, that the only place they felt freedom was when they go out on the ice. We take it for granted.”

Interesting. We’re the opposite — we’ve got freedom, but everything on the ice is controlled.

“We had so many good people on the U.S. team, and many of them are going back to college next year,” Stauber said. “They might be miserable when they find out they’re going to have to go back to dump and chase.”

While Stauber hasn’t been associated with either the Gophers men or women since he quit coaching their goaltenders, he’s aware of the drop in attendance, the grumbling about the switch to the Big Ten, and he knows that the “new breed” journalists think any big name coach could come in and succeed, even though many of the most loyal diehards insist otherwise. All the most-mentioned candidates have some assets and liabilities, whether recruiting, or lacking head coaching experience, and some might be lured more by the large salary than any tradition or heritage.

Stauber covers all the bases — including a gold medal for his coaching experience. He’s only offering positives, including the NHL based criticism about the wide, Olympic ice sheet at Mariucci Arena.

“The wide rink? I would make that a home-ice advantage,” said Stauber. “Just this morning, a fellow who followed what we did with Team USA asked me if I’d plan on playing the same way if I got the Gophers men’s job, and I assured him I would. I have no intention of doing anything but what I believe in.

“But first of all, I hope I get an interview.”

The post From Gold Medal to Maroon and Gold? appeared first on Minnesota Hockey Magazine.

Simply click HERE to begin your FREE digital subscription.  

Enjoy!

The post MHM February 2018 HDM St. Cloud Recap appeared first on Minnesota Hockey Magazine.

Absence of NHL might return purity to Olympic hockey   

Hockey will still be the primary attraction at the 2018 Winter Olympics in South Korea, but it will be out of curiosity more than rampant nationalistic fervor. A whole generation of new hockey fans will be amazed to see the Olympic hockey tournament. completely devoid of National Hockey League superstars.

   To that I say “Good riddance.”

   That’s not because I dislike the NHL, or the presence of so many high-skilled Europeans playing in the NHL. I love hockey at all levels, and the NHL represents its own pinnacle. But while it was great to see the NHL stars representing their countries, I got to experience two Winter Olympic hockey tournaments, one each way, and I realize that international hockey doesn’t need the dictatorial influence of the NHL, which considers the terms “participation” and “control” as synonymous.

   Since 1998, the NHL has closed up shop and allowed its players to return to their national teams, including the U.S., Canada, Russia, Sweden, Finland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Germany, Switzerland, Latvia, and any other countries that produce players of NHL quality. The changeover, heralded by most as a true world tournament of the world’s best players, makes this year an abrupt change back. Almost none of the players — even on the U.S. and Canada — will be  close to the NHL household names of the last 20 years.

Pavel Datsyuk (Photo by Jonny Watkins)

   Two notable exceptions make my choice easy for the gold medal: Russia. Or the independent athletes representing Russia, whichever is determined to be valid. Pavel Datsyuk, who was among the best players in the NHL for the past decade, retired from the Detroit Red Wings of the NHL and took his family home to Russia. He is playing in the KHL, the Russian Kontinental Hockey League, which is clearly the second best pro league to the NHL, and Datsyuk is cavorting around like a 20-year-old, making magnificent plays and scoring sensational goals.

  In a roster listing of all the members of all the nations, Datsyuk’s name leaps off the page as the best individual player in the Olympics, even as he moves closer to his 40th birthday. Great as he is, Datsyuk’s individual skills are better suited to making his linemates and teammates better. That brings us to Ilya Kovalchuk, a mere pup of 34, and Datsyuk’s teammate on the St. Petersburg KHL team. Presumably they will play together on the Russian team, and alone, they make Russia a prohibitive favorite.

  The biggest name on Team USA might be Brian Gionta, former Boston College star who played for New Jersey, Montreal, and Buffalo, choosing to not re-sign with the Sabres after they acquired Jason Pominville from the Wild, in favor of being captain of Team USA. Former St. Cloud State scoring star Garrett Roe, ex-Gopher Ryan Stoa, both playing in Europe, and current WCHA players Troy Terry of Denver and defenseman Will Borgen of St. Cloud State also were named to the roster by coach Tony Granato.

St. Cloud State defenseman, and current Olympian, Will Borgen. (St. Cloud State Athletics)

  My recommendation would have been to call together representatives from all the college leagues and, just after the first of the year, select a college all-star team to go to the Olympics as Team USA. They would be youthful, exuberant, exciting, highly skilled, and if lacking pro experience, they would have been a huge attraction to the television moguls who are still looking for another miracle.

  Canada’s most recognizable names might be Mason Raymond, who starred at UMD and had some strong years with Vancouver in the NHL, before signing to play in Bern, Switzerland, and Chay Genoway, a four-year puck-rushing defenseman and superstar at North Dakota. He was signed by the Minnesota Wild, but got only one game with the parent club, and signed to play for Lada in the KHL.

  Very good players, but a considerable distance from Pavel Datsyuk.

  To me, the best part of the change to allow NHL players was to level the rink, to coin a phrase, for all countries, compared to the days when Russian and other European players who stayed home to play in their own leagues, where they might have been paid, but they also held jobs or were in the military to remain “amateurs” in the eyes of the Olympics, against the true amateurs from the U.S. and Canada.

  And perhaps the worst change in the tournament structure is because of the overwhelming influence of network television money — the only thing more dominant than the NHL. After Herb Brooks led Team USA to its incredible 1980 gold medal, the TV networks who were caught by surprise gathered all its forces for the 1984 Winter Olympics, anticipating another miracle. When the U.S. fell short of unfair expectations, the networks were left with huge plots of time and no Team USA. So they enforced a change to something that U.S. viewers could more easily understand.

  Instead of the traditional round-robin preliminary play that led to the top two teams coming together in an extension of that round-robin, which is why top-seeded Soviets and Sweden were scheduled in the final game, so the U.S. had to play the Soviets in the next-to-last round, then face Finland on the final day. Viewers who recall that might remember that the U.S. networks taped the game and played it back in prime time, while Canada television simply adjusted to show the gold-medal game live, in the afternoon.

  Apparently, U.S. viewers aren’t considered bright enough to figure out the unique and compelling round-robin structure, and must have an NCAA-basketball-like bracket of quarterfinals, semifinals and final. That, presumably, will never change back.

  After the NHL let its players loose to play in 1998 at Nagano, Japan, the next turn was 2002 in Salt Lake City, and I had the opportunity to lead one of the dozen separate staffs for the Olympic Committee, with our responsibility the intra-net computer reporting on hockey for all the on-site media types who couldn’t cover all the simultaneous events. Immediately after games, we sent a result piece, press conference story, and various pertinent sidebar features. It was fun and gratifying to watch up close and from the inside, particularly because Herb Brooks coached Team USA.

   We also produced off-game-day features, and I wrote one about how unfair it was of the NHL to hold all its players back until the day before the games actually started. Some of the lesser countries, including Latvia, had its hopes pinned to only a couple of standout players, and because the NHL wouldn’t release them, their plane was landing as Latvia was being eliminated in a preliminary round game. I wrote about it.

   Next thing I knew, a quite-abrasive fellow from the NHL office was present, and assumed control over what I was controlling, editing and even delaying the deadlline stories we produced, to assure any information going to the world’s media would be positive PR for the NHL, rather than incisive facts we accumulated. When I had a long discussion about the situation with the Olympic Committee’s very astute media director, he hesitantly explained to me that he was powerless to do anything to counter the NHL’s control.

  Of course, the NHL was just as eager for Canada to win as the U.S., and when Canada beat the U.S. team in the gold medal final, any observer of the media enclosure would have been certain the Games were being held in a Canadian city as in the U.S.  Another strong NHL influence was to get the Olympic tournament played on NHL size rinks, rather than the traditional 200×100 international ice sheets, which allow much more playmaking and skating and much less forced congestion.

  The more recent games are in harsh contrast to the purity of coverage in Lake Placid, N.Y., in 1980, when I had the thrill of covering all the hockey in the most spectacular Winter Olympics hockey tournament ever. That, also, was a Herb Brooks production, only at that time the official pros of the NHL were not allowed, and only the European pros who were employed outside their hockey endeavors were allowed. That meant all the players from the Soviet Union, Sweden, Finland, the Czechs, Germany and others were essentially pros, while Brooks conquered all with his college-based team that included a dozen Minnesotans and seven from his 1979 University of Minnesota NCAA champions.

   That truly was a “Miracle on Ice,” and covering it was extra special because nobody thought the U.S. had a chance, and almost none of the other media people knew anything about the U.S. players, who had trained for the previous year based in Met Center in Bloomington.

  My favorite recollections are from watching all the games I could, marveling at the skill level of the Soviets and the Swedish and Finnish teams, because our apartment was a last-moment deal at a home across the street from the high school, which was the Olympic Media Center, and the adjacent arena, where all the games were.

  My other favorite moment was when Brooks walked off from the interview room the day after the U.S. had stunned powerful Sweden with a 2-2 tie in the last minute. Brooks had confided in me that he didn’t want to bring two players to post-game media sessions, but figured he had to, right up until the Soviets said they would not. That allowed Brooks, still striving for East-West unity, to leave his players in their dressing room while he met the media. New York columnist Mike Lupica ripped him for being so egotistical he would not allow any of his players to be interviewed — which was far easier than to go out into the cold night air and interview whichever players he wanted to, if he only knew them. Brooks declared that if the columnist he’d never met thought he was coming alone because of his ego, from then on the media could talk to his assistant, Craig Patrick, because Brooks wouldn’t be coming to any more interview sessions.

   I told Brooks he shouldn’t give up the world stage, and he told me he had arranged with the arena manager to hide out in his office after games, in an area the media could not get to, and that I could meet him in that office after every game. That meant I got exclusive interviews with Herb Brooks after every U.S. game, and still have time to race outside and talk to every U.S. player as they departed after showering and dressing.

   It remains a highlight of my career, and maybe one of the best parts of it was that any reporter could use instincts and personal initiative to cover the players and the Games as best they could. A far cry from what was to transpire in the six Winter Olympics tournaments since then.

Note to readers: This article will be in the soon-to-be-published February Winter Special Edition of Minnesota Hockey Magazine that features Hockey Day Minnesota 2018 and St. Cloud hockey.  It will be available in print at store newsstands across Minnesota including Target and Walmart.  Digital issue will be available on the PressPad mobile app platform for Minnesota Hockey Magazine via Apple Store and Amazon/Kindle.  If you want to get it free, subscribe to our e-Edition and it will be sent directly to your email box.  Thanks.  MHM Staff

The post Amateur Hour appeared first on Minnesota Hockey Magazine.